AI Can’t Replace Executive Thinking—Yet. Here's What MIT’s Neuroscience Study Says About Staying Ahead

Artificial intelligence promises efficiency. But a new study from MIT reveals a cautionary tale: When used prematurely in the cognitive process, AI may erode the very skills that drive leadership and innovation.

In a recent analysis highlighted by Ignacio de Gregorio, MIT researchers measured the impact of AI on student brain activity. Their findings, though academic in origin, carry profound implications for business leaders, particularly those at the helm of small and midsize enterprises (SMEs) and executive coaching organizations: AI, when used indiscriminately, can make teams faster—but not better.

The Neuroscience Behind Strategic Thinking

In the MIT study, participants completed writing tasks under three conditions: unaided, aided by traditional search, and aided by ChatGPT. EEG scans tracked brain activity throughout the tasks.

The results were stark. While the AI-assisted group completed tasks more quickly, their neural engagement dropped by up to 55%. In essence, they were thinking less. Not only did their output lack originality, but their cognitive effort—measured through memory, attention, and creativity—significantly declined. The implications for executive function, strategy development, and creative problem-solving are striking.

Why This Matters to CEOs and Executive Coaches

In leadership contexts, the timing and purpose of AI deployment is strategic. Leaders must ask first, whether to use AI, and second, when in the thought process it creates value. Consider these leadership-relevant findings:

• AI Homogenizes Output: When used at the outset of thinking, AI tends to flatten originality. Participants produced near-identical content, shaped by the predictive average of the model. For businesses seeking differentiation, this is a strategic liability. In executive teams, homogeneity breeds groupthink.

• Early AI Use Suppresses Cognitive Engagement: EEG data revealed steep drops in neural activity related to creativity, memory retrieval, and sustained attention. Teams that lean on AI too soon may be skipping the most valuable part of leadership work: grappling with ambiguity, thinking deeply, and generating insight.

• Cognitive Atrophy Sets In Quickly: Alarmingly, participants who became accustomed to AI assistance struggled when transitioning back to independent work. This suggests a form of cognitive de-conditioning—a dangerous precedent for organizations aiming to retain adaptive, resilient talent.

• Delayed Use of AI Boosts Results: When participants engaged in the task independently before introducing AI for editing or refinement, they maintained both high-quality output and strong cognitive engagement. Timing, not just tooling, is critical.

A Strategic Framework for Responsible AI Integration

Business leaders must think of AI as a force multiplier—used deliberately, not automatically. Below is a tactical framework for executive teams and coaches helping organizations build AI-literate cultures.

• Sales Enablement: Start with your team’s authentic value proposition. Use AI for polishing or adapting messages to different audiences—but not for crafting your pitch wholesale. Distinctiveness is a strategic asset.

• Marketing and Branding: Clarify positioning, brand tone, and key narratives internally. Then—and only then—use AI to test variations, enhance clarity, or explore alternatives. Avoid the trap of derivative messaging that sounds like your competitors.

• Strategic Planning: Let leadership teams independently define goals, risks, and opportunities. Use AI to probe assumptions or generate alternate futures, not to produce the first draft of your strategy.

• Talent Acquisition: Define roles based on your organization’s unique needs. Resist the urge to let AI write job descriptions from scratch. Doing so risks stripping away the intentionality behind your team design.

• Customer Experience: Empower teams to analyze customer intent and needs using human insight. AI can support tone, formatting, or scalability—but must never replace empathy or contextual judgment.

For Executive Coaches: A Leadership Moment

Executive coaches are uniquely positioned to guide leaders through this critical inflection point. The AI conversation is philosophical: What does it mean to think well? To lead creatively? To make meaning?

This study offers a neuroscience-backed case for preserving the hard work of human thinking. Coaches can help executives reflect on how and when they use AI—reinforcing cognitive rigor, creative problem-solving, and strategic discernment.

AI’s promise is in its potential to amplify uniquely human strengths. To unlock that, leaders must deploy AI with discernment. Used too early, AI makes us passive. Used well, it can make us better.

As executives confront an increasingly AI-infused landscape, let’s all remember: think first, AI later.

Copyright © 2025 by Arete Coach LLC. All rights reserved.