top of page

Who’s Really Shaping Your Culture? The Hidden Hand of AI

Company culture has traditionally been shaped by leadership, values, rituals, and human relationships. However, artificial intelligence (AI) is now influencing the subtle norms of how employees think, communicate, and make decisions. The result is a transformation of company culture driven by algorithms that were not part of traditional hiring processes.



The Rise of the Algorithmic Middle Manager

AI tools, while designed to boost productivity, are assuming roles akin to invisible middle managers. By suggesting phrasing for feedback, timing for responses, or language for stakeholder communication, AI shapes efficiency, interpersonal tone, and reinforces certain values, guiding the workforce toward specific behavioral norms. For instance:

  • Slack AI summarizes threads by prioritizing certain details, influencing perceptions of importance.

  • Gmail’s Smart Compose encourages politeness and brevity, which may inadvertently reduce candid or critical dialogue over time.

  • GitHub Copilot autocompletes code in specific styles, gradually standardizing technical culture without human oversight.


These features prompt a critical examination: Whose culture is AI reinforcing?


Communication Norms Are Being Optimized

Language is a core component of culture. When AI systems mediate writing, speaking, and idea-sharing, they influence organizational communication.


AI-generated content often leans toward neutrality, non-confrontation, and consensus. While this can streamline communication, it may also suppress productive tension, honest disagreement, and cultural nuances. In fact, research indicates that AI-generated texts promote stylistic uniformity and suppress individual voice, potentially undermining users' confidence and identity (Vashistha & Naaman, 2025).


The Reinforcement Loop: Bias and Behavioral Homogenization

LLMs not only reflect culture but also reinforce it. For example, when a sales team uses AI tools to generate proposals, and those proposals adopt a uniform persuasive tone, a feedback loop is created. This tone becomes the standard for client communication, potentially diminishing diverse approaches.


Recent research regarding the classification of feedback loops in machine learning–based decision systems shows how algorithmic outputs can reinforce and perpetuate bias over time. Drawing from dynamical systems theory, their work reveals how prediction-driven systems can create self-reinforcing cycles that entrench existing norms and obscure emerging perspectives, even when those norms no longer reflect real-world conditions (Pagan, 2023).


For executive coaches and culture stewards, it's imperative to audit where AI acts as a behavioral gatekeeper and to surface the values embedded in both tools and personnel.


The Coach's Mandate: Culture-by-Design in the Age of AI

In this evolving landscape, the coach's role becomes strategically significant. Coaches and culture leaders must identify where AI influences behavior and assess whether this aligns with organizational values.


Key considerations include:

  • Assessing areas where AI simplifies communication and evaluating the trade-offs involved.

  • Identifying which voices or styles receive reinforcement and ensuring diversity is maintained.

  • Evaluating whether algorithms prioritize speed, reflection, safety, or challenge, and aligning these with organizational goals.

  • Encouraging leaders to view AI as a co-architect of culture, integrating it thoughtfully into organizational practices.


Coaches can facilitate workshops on AI self-awareness, guiding leaders and teams to reflect on their interactions with AI and its impact on behavior. Designing "algorithm-aware rituals" can create intentional spaces for teams to consider how AI shapes their thinking and interactions.


Values Alignment in the Age of Digital Coworkers

Aligning values is essential for both people and systems. Organizations typically have onboarding processes to instill values in new employees. Similarly, introducing AI tools requires deliberate efforts to ensure they reflect and uphold company values.


Research on AI’s impact on organizational work and culture underscores the need to align AI-driven changes with existing cultural values, offering strategies to navigate these transformations effectively (Tariq, 2021):

  • Cultural Alignment: Align AI adoption with a culture of innovation, learning, and growth, led by transparent and ethical leadership.

  • Clear Communication: Explain AI’s purpose clearly, involve all levels of staff, and encourage feedback to build trust.

  • Ethical Integration: Ensure AI aligns with values through strong governance that addresses privacy, bias, and job impact.

  • Ongoing Learning: Invest in upskilling and partnerships to build AI, data, and collaboration skills across the organization.

  • Impact & Innovation: Regularly assess AI’s cultural effects and foster safe experimentation to balance tech with human value.

  • (Tariq, 2021)

Building on these principles, implementing AI Values Alignment Protocols could further operationalize alignment efforts by incorporating practical actions such as:

  1. Testing AI tools for tone and fairness.

  2. Customizing prompts to reflect company values.

  3. Educating employees on identifying misalignments.

  4. Encouraging teams to question and refine AI outputs.


In the future of work, digital tools perform tasks and model behavior, making their alignment with organizational values crucial.


Leadership Beyond the Visible

Future leaders will recognize that culture is shaped by boardroom decisions and algorithmic suggestions. They will treat AI as a cultural actor requiring direction, alignment, and thoughtful oversight.


Executive coaches and business leaders have the opportunity to guide this shift, leading with awareness, intent, and stewardship.


By proactively shaping how AI reflects organizational culture, companies can preserve their cultural integrity amidst technological advancements.


References

Pagan, N., Baumann, J., Elokda, E., De Pasquale, G., Bolognani, S., & Hannák, A. (2023). A Classification of Feedback Loops and Their Relation to Biases in Automated Decision-Making Systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.06055. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.06055


Tariq, M., Odonkor, S., & Smith, J. (2021). Artificial Intelligence and Its Role in Shaping Organizational Work Practices and Culture. ResearchGate https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386233612


Vashistha, A., & Naaman, M. (2025). A.I. Is Homogenizing Our Thoughts. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/culture/infinite-scroll/ai-is-homogenizing-our-thoughts


Copyright © 2025 by Arete Coach LLC. All rights reserved.

1 Comment


Casinos with no verification tend to be simpler, but responsible gambling is still important. Learn about time limitations and self-exclusion mechanisms because impulsive spending might rise if there is no verification. Dutch gamers may https://we.riseup.net/nokyc/bitcoin-casino-with-no-verification maintain a fun and healthy gambling experience in any environment by giving priority to platforms that encourage responsible gaming.

Like
bottom of page